C6’s process begins with the creation of a pilot campaign, designed to establish baseline performance metrics and gauge the feasibility of a full-scale recruitment effort. In the summer of 2020, a research site partnered with C6 to recruit Alzheimer’s study candidates on a pay-per-lead basis. C6 built and managed a site-branded digital marketing campaign between July and December 2020, with a total investment of $24,180 from the research site. The campaign generated 310 Alzheimer’s leads at a cost-per-lead of $78.00, without any additional setup or fixed-rate costs.
The pilot campaign provided valuable insights into the recruitment funnel:
– 76% (237) of the leads were contacted for an initial phone screen
– 35% (101) of the leads were pre-screened by a physician
– 4.2% (13) of the leads entered the trial screening phase
– 0.65% (2) of the leads were randomized into the trial
The patient acquisition cost (PAC) for the pilot campaign was $12,090.
Armed with the pilot campaign’s performance data, C6 was able to forecast the results of a full-scale recruitment campaign with a high degree of accuracy. This predictability empowered the research site to approach clinical study sponsors with a compelling case for securing local advertising budget.
C6 proposed a full-scale campaign for 2021, aiming to enroll 10 randomized patients with a budget of $124,800. The campaign was forecasted to generate 1,600 leads and assumed a 0.65% randomization rate, based on the pilot campaign’s results.
Budget for the full-scale campaign was secured from a major pharmaceutical company who’s study was behind forecast for patient enrollment. The campaign, which ran from February to September 2021, exceeded expectations:
– 1,926 Alzheimer’s trial information leads were delivered
– 75.65% (1,457) of the leads underwent phone screenings
– 28.97% (558) of the leads were pre-screened
– 4.85% (95) of the leads entered the screening phase
– 0.62% (12) of the leads were randomized into the trial
The actual cost per randomized patient was $12,519, closely aligning with the forecasted cost of $12,480. The total budget utilized for the campaign was $150,228.